The Range Rover Evoque — it certainly does.
Price: $4.99
2012
(as of November 25, 2020 - More infoProduct prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.)
Price: $4.99
2012 (4K UHD)
(428)
Price: $3.99
The Day After Tomorrow
(as of November 25, 2020 - More infoProduct prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.)
Price: $4.99
2012: Doomsday
(191)
His voice is like spoon in a spin dryer.
The screen is set this way so your hand can rest on the edge as you select the button with your pointing finger. No stabbing or jabbing. Simple and very user friendly.
love the unique design on this car
I think that this suv/hatchback is more for a lady.
We need an Evoque Cabriolet review!
It doesn’t need to be that deep. My navigation system has half the deepness of that and has no problems with glare.
So did this car break down yet?
i compared both GLK vs this and went with the 2014 GLK blu tech (AWD) and saved $8000.
This guy sucks
I own one and love it. Navigation screen blacking out is my only fuss, but using voice takes care of that
this car is super star
Nice
Cnet should not be doing car reviews, over use of the word controversial and the infomercialesque inability on how to use simple things. Sadly I have been inside cars with people like this, they get upset over petty stuff and over react like its the end of the world. Also they’re a tech media company and think they can make it better, but its only to their taste and not others.
Those pictures at the start were NOT Range Rovers. They were Land Rover Series 1s.
He hated on it so harsh I bet he drives a prius
tttyyy
This overpriced, unrefined piece of doggy doo doo costs close to $95000 here in India.
Love this review,
For the price this car is rubbish. It made for the rich kid or someone who wants a range rover but can’t afford the bigger one
too expensive for a car that has a ford engine.
u r d best fucking reviewer aside from Jeremy Clarkson
Please restrict yourself to hard disk and phone review…range rover should just not hand their car to any tom for reviews
It’s a good thing. Why would you want to see reviews where they say good things about crappy cars? You want lies? Go to the dealer.
this dudes just bashing this car lol i like it i have a phone for nav all i will use on that media center is music everything else is perfect
Looks cool but the engine should have been in house developed and exclusive to LR. Somehow stuffing a V8 under there and even raising the price $15K would make it very special. The chop top look is really outstanding.
Am I the only one who thinks the coupe for this car is a stupid idea
the car handles like a car? well i never
3:35 and forward just has me dying. I love Brian Cooley
It says what they mean on the screen in the dash, which is where you should be looking anyways. Beside, would you really except all the settings to be written out in that little amount of space especially considering one of the Settings is “Grass, Gravel Snow.”
Have to agree about the address input screen though the way it blacks out after ever button push is ridiculous.
Excellent report. I loved it!
my dream car
You are fucked as hell..What he says is true this guy is experienced.. Fuck you man!!
Why would you ruin a new car by adding a ford engine. Not saying it’s a bad engine for I never drove the car, but it gives people a bad feel especially if the brand you’re buying for has the “heart” of the car not made by the same company.
I really think CNET should stop reviewing cars. They are a computer/software company so they know absolutely nothing about how car technology works. Ask them about MyFord Touch and they’ll tell you everything you wanna know. Mention double overhead camshafts or direct injection and naturally aspirated exhaust and you’ll send their head spinning. People who trust CNET for actual car reviewing and advice might as well ask a landscaper to perform their brain surgery.
bwahbwah bwah i can’t stand hearing negative views because it makes me question my false convictions and i prefer listening to candycane reviews where the reviewer inly says good things so i can feel like i am right.
guys, listem to yourselves talking. then shut up
What I think many people like about CNET and their car reviews is the fact that they focus a lot on the technology in the cars (and outside), something which many other reviewers do now.
This guy is the biggest fuckwhit of all car reviewers he has no fucking clue
Q5 instead about same price .
negative person cant stand him. this car is awesome btw
damn this guy is so negative
In Malaysia, Evoque price is about $300,000!
Well I assume that Range Rover will fix everything he picked on so that’s what’s good about this review.
Stefan really liked this car. He drove with his friend Ewald through a place he called Eckstein and said it was a blast!
I like Ford and I like their engines so I’m fine with an Ecoboost engine under the Evoque’s hood. But at this price, I’d rather see them make the 2.3L Twin-scroll Ecoboost engine as standard instead of this 2.0L one with turbo lag.
In Brazil this car costs 80000 dollars the cheapest one. Taxes and taxes for everyone
Fukin American
This guy should be driving a cadilac with the kind of things he knit picks. He’s completely missing the point
Why so much criticism on this car?
STFU about this guy, he is the greatest guy to review cars since top gear uk. He gets to the point and is brutally honest. Deal with it.